The
story “Teddy” by J.D. Salinger ends with “an all-piercing, sustained
scream--clearly coming from a small, female child” (Salinger 198). This scream
is never explained and we never find out for sure what has happened to end the
story. However, there are clues to a possible ending where Teddy is pushed into
the empty pool by his sister and fractures his skull on the bottom of the pool,
dying instantly. While there is no way to tell for sure whether this is the
correct interpretation of the final scene, Teddy himself describes a similar
scene and this is likely what Nicholson is thinking.
Teddy
explains to Nicholson that he thinks everyone takes death too seriously and
that they shouldn’t be worried because they have all done it thousands of times
before. He says,
“It's so silly,"
Teddy said again. "For example, I have a swimming lesson in about five minutes.
I could go downstairs to the pool, and there might not be any water in it. This
might be the day they change the water or something. What might happen, though,
I might walk up to the edge of it, just to have a look at the bottom, for
instance, and my sister might come up and sort of push me in. I could fracture
my skull and die instantaneously." Teddy looked at Nicholson. "That
could happen," he said. "My sister's only six, and she hasn't been a
human being for very many lives, and she doesn't like me very much. That could
happen, all right. What would be so tragic about it, though? What's there to be
afraid of, I mean? I'd just be doing what I was supposed to do, that's all,
wouldn't I?"
Teddy
lays out an elaborate scene of his own death and explains how it wouldn’t be tragic
if it actually happened. Teddy has just explained to Nicholson that he could’ve
told the professors when and how they were going to die, but hadn’t because he
knew that it would upset them. Instead, he just told them some possibilities and
times when they should be careful. Similarly, he never tells anyone when he is
going to die, but says that he knows. This detailed description of how he could
die could actually be his prediction of how he will die disguised in a way that
will not alarm Nicholson. Teddy wants to tell Nicholson something but not
actually reveal that he will probably die that day.
In
addition to this conversation with Nicholson, Teddy writes in his diary that “It
will either happen today or February 14, 1955 when I am sixteen. It is
ridiculous to mention even” (Salinger 182). This entry is not explained or
elaborated in any way and we are not given any clues as to what it means.
However, looking back, it is quite possible that this entry is referring to
Teddy’s own death. We know from Teddy’s conversation with Nicholson that Teddy
can predict his own death but that his prediction is not completely inevitable.
We also know that he doesn’t think that death is very important. He only sees
death as getting out of your body and moving on, something that everyone has
done thousands of times even though they don’t remember it. This indifference to
death could help explain his last sentence in the entry that it is ridiculous
to mention.
While
we don’t know for sure what happens in the pool at the very end of the story.
It is quite possible that Teddy has predicted his own death and that this
prediction has come true. Teddy mentions this prediction in a way that doesn’t make
it seem especially important or true. But Teddy also says that he doesn’t tell
people fully what will happen because it will upset people. His journal entry
saying that something will probably happen today and his detailed explanation
to Nicholson make it seem like he does know that he is going to die and that he
has most likely been pushed into the empty pool by his sister.
I wrote a blog post on a similar topic, and there are definitely clues sprinkled throughout the story that indicate to Teddy's death. The way that Nicholson hurries to the pool after their conversation and the little girl's scream that follows also make it seem as though Teddy's very specific prediction comes true.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Salinger seems to challenge us, in this story, to accept the idea that Teddy anticipates and foresees his own death, and I think you nail the reason for doing so in your observation that Teddy himself makes this prediction "in a way that doesn't make it seem especially important or true." He has no "sentimental" attachment to this world, finds it "interesting" but has no qualms about his life ending. It's this casualness that contains the challenge: can we grasp a worldview in which there is nothing tragic or sad about a young boy's accidental death? It's a kind of "proof" of Teddy's stated philosophy, when we see him reflect such indifference to his own life or death, the epitome of detachment from the material world.
ReplyDelete